NEWSLETTER #2
February 5, 2011
AT THE COURT ARGUMENT TUESDAY THE BOROUGH SHOULD MENTION THE FOLLOWING FROM THE BORUGH COUNCIL MINUTES OF 2002:
August 6, 2002 page 15896 “Mayor Marino stated that all residents are stockholders and that he wants to be updated monthly. Mr. Hill responded that if this is the direction in which Council would like to proceed, the Borough would need to hire a full time accountant”.
September 11, 2002 page 15937 Mr. Caruso stated “The paperwork that is done to justify what the Borough is spending is ridiculous. The idea of hiring a consultant is nonsense. Anyone that has a question concerning the spending should pick up a budget and follow the expenditures.
THE ABOVE MINUTES CLEARLY DEMONSTRATE THAT THE BOROUGH NEVER INTENDED TO MAKE THE FINANCES OF THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT PUBLIC.
THERE’S MORE. ( TO BE CONT’D)
Gennaro A. Marino
www.marinoreport. com
Saturday, February 5, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
how can the kutztown council possibly argue that they dont have to comply with an open records request without looking like they have something to hide?
can anyone answer that without employing more 8th grade ad hominem bullsh*t? i doubt it.
"Pennsylvania Office of Open Records has already decided the Borough should produce the records requested."
Post a Comment